CHANGE
Hillary has made change rather than just talk about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhydLhz48_k
CIVIL LIBERTIES
from about.com
DEFENSE
From Peter Daou of HRC campaign
The Democrat who eventually faces Sen. McCain will require a set of skills and experiences that enables them to:
a) compete on a broad playing field;
b) confront and beat back a GOP attack machine waiting to tear them down;
c) put forth and defend core Democratic ideas - and ideals - such as universal health care;
d) build a solid coalition for victory;
e) and importantly, stand toe-to-toe with Sen. McCain on national security.
Hillary excels on each of these fronts
here is mp3 with call with generals and senior defense officials that support hillary
ECONOMICS
Great Mother Jones article comparing Hillary and Barack's top 10 economic policies:
Housing/Subprime, Tax policy, Seniors/Social Security/Retirement Policy, College Education, Worker Pay/Sick Benefits, High Wage/Green Job Growth, Health Care, Corporate Tax Policy, Credit/Lending Policy, Family-Oriented Policy.
Clinton Beats Obama 5:3 on economic issues. (wins in bold)
LGBT Rights
Obama refuses to take photos with Mayor of San Francisco or be in same room with Mayor b/c of fear of association with LGBT rights. read huffpo article here.
HEALTHCARE
Obama's poor judgement/unbold stance on healthcare
He doesn't have everyone in the system, thus it is expensive and those with health insurance end up paying for those that don't pay.
Obama's Judgment and Empty Record by Joe Wilson from Huffpo
summary:
- Barack often implies (and sometimes outright lies) that he was in the midst of a "high stakes" Senate campaign when he gave the speech. This is not true. He gave the speech BEFORE he announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate. The truth is that he was running for re-election to his Illinois state senate seat -- and representing the most liberal district in Illinois.
- After his arrival in the U.S. Senate, but interestingly BEFORE he started running for President, Barack stated on numerous occassions that he doesn't know how he would have voted in the Senate because he wasn't there and didn't have access to the same information they did.
- When he finally did have a chance to actually prove his sound judgment on Afghanistan as chairman of the senate subcommittee responsible for overseeing for NATO and Europe, he neglected his responsibility completely -- failing to hold a single hearing in the 14 months he held his chairmanship.
- On Iran, Barack has waffled on whether to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. He first co-sponsored a bill that contained language stating exactly that, but later claims to have opposed the Kyl-Lieberman resolution proposing the same thing (a resolution that he conveniently was not present to vote on).full article here by Joe Wilson on Huffpo
Media Biased towards Obama?
Media say "Hillary is a fashion victim and Obama is cool." Us Weekly is owned by Wenner Media, publisher of Rolling Stone, which published a profile of Mr. Obama last year but has not had an article about Mrs. Clinton in this campaign.
Obama Missing In Action in his Senate duties.
How many bills has Obama passed? ONE.
Barack Obama has sponsored 129 bills since Jan 4, 2005, of which 120 haven't made it out of committee (Poor) and 1 were successfully enacted (Average, relative to peers).
Obama MISSING IN ACTION. Too busy running for president to get ANY senate experience
Barack Obama missed 201 of 1121 votes (18%) since Jan 6, 2005 (Exceedingly Poor relative to peers).
source govtrack
Hillary Clinton missed 175 of 2429 votes (7%) since Jan 23, 2001 (Poor relative to peers).
Hm. Hillary with 2x the experience in senate has missed FEWER votes.
NAFTA
-gate http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvCEFmKAoB4
10.07 Obama Says He Will Vote for NAFTA Expansion
On RACE
"How Barack Obama played the race card and blamed Hillary Clinton" from The New Republic, Sean Wilentz
Reverend Wright
great post on http://koreanpower999.wordpress.com/
Barack Obama transcends ___________________? (fill in the blank) March 17, 2008
Obama's history as an Illinois state senator
For 6 years of his 7 year tenure "Obama backed legislation that went nowhere; bill after bill died in committee. During those six years, Obama, too, would have had difficulty naming any legislative achievements."
In 2002, IL Dems controlled both legislative chambers and the governor's office. Then "Jones appointed Obama sponsor of virtually every high-profile piece of legislation, angering many rank-and-file state legislators who had more seniority than Obama and had spent years championing the bills."
"I don't consider it bill jacking," Hendon told me. "But no one wants to carry the ball 99 yards all the way to the one-yard line, and then give it to the halfback who gets all the credit and the stats in the record book."
"On the stump, Obama has frequently invoked his experiences as a community organizer on the Chicago South Side in the early 1990s....
"as a state senator, Obama evaded leadership on a host of critical community issues, from historic preservation to the rapid demolition of nearby public-housing projects, according to many South Siders.
"Even many of his staunchest supporters, such as Black, still resent the strong-arm tactics Obama employed to win his seat in the Illinois Legislature. Obama hired fellow Harvard Law alum and election law expert Thomas Johnson to challenge the nominating petitions of four other candidates .... he knocked off all the contenders. He won the seat unopposed."
source:Barack Obama and Me, Houston Press
For the real brainiacs... SAT word lovers...
"Reject vs. Renounce"
the quarrel between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton came down to a matter of direct objects. Both "reject" and "denounce" are transitive verbs -- they act upon a direct object -- but the candidates weren't talking about the same objects. The object of Mr. Obama's denunciation was Mr. Farrakhan's opinions, particularly his anti-Semitic comments, whereas Mrs. Clinton was urging her opponent to reject the minister's support. The thrust of Mrs. Clinton's challenge was that her opponent was merely highlighting a particular disagreement with Mr. Farrakhan, while still accepting his -- and his organization's -- backing.
To make the distinction even sharper, suppose, hypothetically, that Mr. Farrakhan had given money to the Obama campaign. In that situation, could Mr. Obama argue that denouncing Mr. Farrakhan's views was just as good as rejecting his donation? Presumably not, as he would still face calls to return the check.source: NYT, The Object of His Rejection, Adam Freedman
VETERANS
2.28.08
Hillary introduces Bill to Help Returning Veterans Succeed in College